Detailed comparison of a L5 vs degoogled phone

General Privacy & Security
41

While I try to avoid Uber whenever possible, it is occasionally useful, I had no idea this was possible so thanks for pointing out!

42

The development team at /e/OS just posted this in their forum, regarding the comparison study:


It would be interesting to see a study that specifically examines all the custom Android ROMs.

Of course, we know that the L5 and Pinephone are going to beat any of those.

43
4 Likes
44

Too bad it does not mention Replicant.

2 Likes
47

One thing I don’t understand about android phones, even those with graphene and calyx OS is why the linux kernel in always only updated but never upgraded, not even to newer LTS versions?

48

Because of the devices themselves – often, the drivers are not part of the mainline kernel, and to properly work the OS needs a kernel customized by the manufacturer. There might be even closed-source drivers. This limits the potential of updating to newer releases of the kernel.

2 Likes
49

I have a degoogled phone that fortunately the screen broke a few weeks ago, I’ve been using only the L5 since then. The most challenging thing has been driving without a gps to long trips, but it’s so strange to use my brain to drive, the landscapes seem to change, i see more things. The L5 has almost everything I need and it’s so elegant to be using one of the latest kernels and be able to upgrade. I have used graphene OS, calyx OS, Lineage…I also have a pinephone, it’s amazing how much easier it is to change distros on the linux phones.

5 Likes
50

Exactly. I know this effect for so long now (games theory I explored). You also remember roads much better. However, GPS works (or at least should) on L5. The question is: do you want to use it after your new old experience? :grinning:

4 Likes
52

I have tried pure maps but it barely works, gnome maps that I have on mobian in the PP recently got a a nice update I must test it if works to drive. But I am much more to using my brain now, maybe I will buy a paper map.

3 Likes
53

What doesn’t work for you? For me it’s only clunky entry for destinations. I think that would be OK if I didn’t use dark mode (@#$% Qt apps!).

I don’t use it often, but the GPS performs well and PureMaps doesn’t lag and gives good turn-by-turn. I am using the default map provider, OSM.

2 Likes
54

I tried about three times, the first it froze the phone and I had to force reboot. The second it took a long time to find the gps signal and got stucked. Third time it was kind of working but updating my position every few minutes…maybe it’s the region where I am using it?

3 Likes
55

OK, I should have remembered to add that PureMaps often doesn’t see GPS if you just enable location services. I leave leave location services off most of the time. To use PureMaps, I:

  1. Turn on location services.
  2. Reboot.
  3. Start PureMaps.

GPS gets a good lock for me within a minute or so.

4 Likes
56

“Nothing to compare the Librem 5 with a degoogled devices. L5 it just a Pure Linux-GNU Phone with zero android dependencies, obsolescence.”

I love this comment because it is short, clear and to the point.

2 Likes
57

I’m thinking how to answer this question… carlos gomez gave a good answer that I’ll expand a bit referring to the security and privacy section.

Anything underdeveloped, upgrades and timely upgrades and connected to the internet is not secure.
Anything that is in development, that is upgraded and upgraded in a timely manner we believe is secure enough.

The next level is what services and applications we use and how we use them.
Research the parts of your device (software and hardware) and how many parts follow the development and upgrade “mantra”.

Ask yourself questions:

  1. Does my favorite brand-system follow the rules of open source?
  2. Does it transparently indicate what is not open source and why and what are the possible threats to security and privacy as a result?
  3. What have they done to protect privacy at system and application level explained and documented in detail?
  4. Does it warn me which applications and services are closed source or partially closed source and what are the privacy and security risks, which open source applications are potentially dangerous and why?
  5. Do they warn you that parts of the system are at the end of life, that there are no more upgrades, and how does this affect privacy and security?
    6.Did they tell you that they didn’t upgrade the potentially dangerous version of the application-service and whay?
    7.Do they actively investigate and find vulnerabilities in the system and issue patches?
    8.Does it perform regular and timely security upgrades of the system system?
    9.Does it perform regular and timely security upgrades of the system system?
  6. yes, I know, I repeat three times:Does it perform regular and timely security upgrades of the system system.

If most of the answers are negative, they unfortunately don’t have enough resources or don’t even care about your security and privacy whatever it may be.

2 Likes