I don’t trust data traffic anonymization enough, I can’t be sure in the validity of claims.
“Our tech” is the incorrect terminology because one cannot be certain if one’s tech is truly one’s tech. I would say it is the usual case that the tech companies, not the governments, fund these bill proposals. Such case scenarios would be considered surveillance capitalism, if not government surveillance. The protests are against the corporations for infringing against freedoms, not the democratic/constitutional governments, whose foundations support the ideals of freedom. That said, I find it appalling that you would shift the blame onto the governments than onto the very corporations that holds this power. Unless you are talking about (civil) judicial oversight or war rhetoric, I maintain my opinion about surveillance capitalism as the culprit for such bills.
!!!ATTENTION!!!
I don’t know if your argument is considered a valid lawful argument, it might even aligns with criminal endorsement. The EARN IT Act of 2022 is a bill proposal to prevent/punish online sexual exploitation of children. Such arguments against this bill would merit the reputation of a criminal antagonism!
Maybe arguments against these bills does have merit, but a counter proposal for bill revision would do the job.
!!!ATTENTION!!!