Yes, it would have been easier if op had clarified what data he was referring to. But it’s clear that he wanted to know if Purism has access to the data on Librem Social. They do.
Now, I still think it’s possible for someone to understand that tooting something public means it’s, well, public - and still think toots to followers-only is more private, maybe even encrypted.
It could be that we never get to know if the op was thinking along those lines, but other people finding this thread might. In which case a straight “no encryption” answer would be helpful.
My apologies, I didn’t notice that sentence. (Also, I can’t find any official mention of this removal.)
So, wondering how Librem Social deals with incoming PMs from other Mastodon instances or other apps, I found this:
Problem fixed server-side, one way or other…