Just to be pedantic, “bloodware” may refer to software made using torture, human sacrifice, killing of innocents or sucking someones neck to regain life energy (I assume to code through the night)  “Bloatware” was coined to refer to software that was mostly unusable, unnecessary and unwanted - and sometimes unremovable. These can be thought of as the latter, but as these are more useable than what the MS, Android, Apple et al. add/ed, and because those do provide security and privacy features (which you apparently do not want), the term (either one) seems a bit of an exaggeration - though I agree, user should have easier option to de-select them
  “Bloatware” was coined to refer to software that was mostly unusable, unnecessary and unwanted - and sometimes unremovable. These can be thought of as the latter, but as these are more useable than what the MS, Android, Apple et al. add/ed, and because those do provide security and privacy features (which you apparently do not want), the term (either one) seems a bit of an exaggeration - though I agree, user should have easier option to de-select them 
But all kidding aside, more importantly, I am left to wonder, if you might be doing yourself a disservice by removing them, as that may differentiate you from other users and make your online fingerprint more specific (something that Tor-browser model is trying to avoid)…? It may not matter for your use-case, of course. See also: https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/