Anyone experience an issue with the latest update?

Oddly enough when I used the tune2fs (at least I think it was when I ran that), it told me that I had mounted that disk too long (it preferred a fresh mount… don’t we all?), and it wanted me to run fsck. It was probably because I had mounted it when my computer auto-asked me. Then dismounted. Then mounted again.

When I ran fsck, it gave me two things it thought it had fixed. I forget exactly what they were, but they didn’t sound too critical. Something like it was using up too much space? I don’t remember. I looked, but couldn’t find the exact message again. —Free blocks count wrong? I think that’s what it was.

I’ll try to go through the process again tomorrow or something, and maybe copy over a couple other files too, just in case. I should be plenty faster at it by know.

Thank you immensely for all of your help. I’m pretty sure if my problem were only those two files, it would have been solved, but it must just be running deeper.

It is quite often the case that getting over one issue unmasks another.

When you get back to it, check if there is a “lost+found” directory in your root filesystem and what, if anything, it contains.

On the plus side, you have made some progress, as you can now type the crypto passphrase on screen it rules out a hardware failure. And, as you can open the LUKS container and mount the root filesystem on your desktop machine it’s not completely disastrous. My mind is still leaning a little more towards the possibility that there are other files on the /boot drive that are probably not right more than anything else.

I’ll be interested to hear how you get on.

3 Likes

Woke up a 5 am, so I went back through the steps. Ran fsck again and it again found Free blocks and Free inodes counted wrong. But supposedly fixed it. This time I just copied the System.map… and boot.scr file and got back out. Unmounted, booted up, and it worked!

Thank you, thank you, thank you, Loki.

My phone works, and it was oddly entertaining learning experience!

4 Likes

Good job, that’s great news and good to hear.

I would be a little concerned about the inode count discrepancy and is something that probably should be investigated a little further.

It also wouldn’t hurt, particularly as you want to avoid starting fresh, to take an image of the phone’s full disk while it’s in a known good state.

I second this.

I’m just booting Jumpdrive and using dd ... | gzip ... on the host computer for this. I haven’t been rigorous in finding the fastest options - but gzip was to a remote file on the local network anyway and the host computer is not superfast and it was still fast enough for my purposes (under 10 minutes).

I took a day off, since I was happy just to use my phone again, but now I kind of want to investigate a little more. I noticed something weird. Before the issue, my phone had been giving me the “Low Disk Space on ‘Filesystem root’” error, so I tried to do a pretty good cleanup. I followed the instructions on how to purge old kernels and such, and thought all went fine, but I still got that message (albeit with a bit more space). So when I updated, and I experienced failure similar to others’ failures caused by running out of space, I assumed that was it. However:

Which I believe is probably mostly the case. Ok, well Loki was able to help me get my phone back up and running. Awesome. A big part of it was replacing the two same files that fixed the original problem - but it just had to be done in a much more complicated manner.

I did notice though that I am still getting the error message: “Low Disk Space on ‘Filesystem root’” and it thinks I only have 125.4 MB of space. However, df claims I have 341,248. I find this odd. Perhaps the fact that df thinks I have enough space, but the message system thinks I don’t have enough space, is related to my previous issue that cause failure after the update. i.e. the fix didn’t work on my phone because of this anomaly. It did manifest the same way, and if the way it checks for space is df or similar, maybe it just didn’t realize I didn’t have enough space. Y’all have thoughts on this? Including @dos?

So now I’m a bit apprehensive to apply the update that just came out, since I have conflicting stories about how much room I have. So I’ll be seeing if I can fix that next.

Are you talking about the root file system (which is /) or the /boot file system. In the root file system you should have some Gigabyte free disk space:

purism@pureos:~$ df -kh /
Filesystem                                              Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/disk/by-uuid/30f84051-7df0-4986-9c56-4401529be1ec   29G   11G   17G  38% /
purism@pureos:~$ df -kh /boot
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mmcblk0p1  451M   94M  334M  22% /boot
3 Likes

Yeah, good comment. I read and wrote root. That’s what the error said. In my mind I thought boot, because of course I “knew” that boot was the smaller one that could fill up and give me issues. So I never checked the large partition. Like you said, there should be gigs of free space.

So I ran df again and looked back where I probably should’ve noticed before. /dev/dm-0 (my root) had just a bit over 120MB of room. So the phone was not lying to me. But how was that possible. Total space 3,783,616 total, with most of it used. Didn’t make sense to me, since like you said, it was supposed to be 30G or so (and why I never looked at it to begin with).

So I checked out the partitions…

And there it is. Someone short-changed me on my partitions when the phone was setup. So as @guru noted this IS where I was running out of room (but didn’t think to check, because I expected plenty). And it’s why when I tried to make more on the boot partition it didn’t help.

I’d guess that running out of room on the root partition is what caused the initial fail after update? And why the initial fix for that problem didn’t catch it - if the fix just verifies the /boot partition for sufficient space, but space is needed on the /root as well?

But hey - now it seems I just have to expand a partition to prevent the issue from recurring. And to get some more storage space. Thanks all. Let my egregious oversight serve as a warning to all.

1 Like

If you installed the LUKS variant of byzantium from scratch then I believe that is known, intentional and annoying behaviour. You are expected to expand the partition immediately after the install.

1 Like

So, until this last journey into mounting a non-native image to copy over files, the only changes I’ve made to the primary software package are the updates - once manually, but the rest through the Purism GUI. And I haven’t done any manual re-partitioning. But seeing the LUKS partition sure does make it seem like that’s what is on my device. But I’m supposing the LUKS variant doesn’t go in on one of the updates, so it would have to have been a “factory” install choice.

1 Like

IMO, this is most likely related to the fact that you powered on, for the very first time, your Librem 5 with the almost empty BPP-L503 battery and your Librem 5 turned off without allowing to PureOS to auto-expand its related partitions? After recharging your phone battery you continued using it without “by itself” expanded partitions, without taking care about data space available to/after your specific case “factory” PureOS installation.

1 Like

This is misleading information. Users are expected and encouraged to check if auto-expanding of two PureOS partitions happened (if ever such non-expanding of partitions thing happens, with initially turning on Librem 5 under its original power supply connected, for example). In other words, regularly and usually there is no need to expand partitions by any new Librem 5 phone user.

1 Like

That would make sense then. Any reason not to use the native “Disks” GUI preloaded on the LIbrem 5?

1 Like

I think that gnome-disks is very useful application and complementing Librem 5 features just fine. One implementation example is kindly confirmed here:

Another DE usage is shown here:

To include that the second option here might be executed under CLI as well:
https://manpages.debian.org/testing/gnome-disk-utility/gnome-disks.1.en.html

Gnome-disks had the the resize option greyed out. Maybe because it just opens up with user privileges? I was going to try and open the GUI using sudo from the terminal, but while I was in there, I decided to just try and do it manually. Sequence to expand the LUKS partition went something like this:

(all with sudo)
parted —pretend-input-tty /dev/mmcblk0 resizepart 2 100%
partx -u /dev/mmcblk0
cryptsetup resize /dev/mapper/crypt_root
resize2fs /dev/mapper/crypt_root

df suggests that it worked, although it looks kind of funny in gnome-disks now. Maybe just needs a reboot. But maybe I don’t reboot and enjoy the phone for awhile in case I totally screwed something up that will manifest on reboot.

Update - I went ahead and let it update and reboot. Worked fine, and now it looks normal in gnome-disks. Now root has expanded to the rest of the drive and no more out of space errors.

2 Likes

I get the same error about 500-800MB remaining depending on the day.

Btw in gnome browser i cannot uploaad images to the forum which is a bummer.

@N8W all lines together at once or line after line? Id rather not brick my phone that early in its life :yum::yum::stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: i have done that on Sailfish OS twice while trying to resize root partition, that was even without encryption.

I would say: always line after line so that you stop if something isn’t right.

Note that the forum has butchered the parted command option. It should be
---pretend-input-tty
and is a hidden (undocumented) option.

Edit: For clarity, confirming, the option is preceded by 3 dashes i.e. relatively non-standard. Not 1, not 2, but 3.

1 Like

3 dashes? (10 chars)

Yes.