This is basically the line of the discussion I had with support.
- The shipped an item with a known issue.
- The issue itself does not seem completely resolved. There are mixed reports of it being resolved while some users still seem to have the same issue, even recently.
- Damage is defined as “not pristine”. Even if they willingly admit any damage had nothing to do with the issue, they blame the customer.
- They are a small laptop company and with how many units they ship, probably not worth the time/effort for a class action law suit.
The result as I see it is Purism not lasting long in the longrun. Still no ETA on my RMA. In this case, literally no matter what Purism says, they are STILL in violation of the EU consumer protection regulations, in about 2-3 cases. Given the time frame, I could have opted for a refund completely without an RMA, because that is the local regulation. They even do not comply with that.
In short, Purism:
- Has no real respect for the regulations in the markets they operate.
- Are willing to knowingly ship faulty products and not honor legal regulations.
- Keep quiet about the issues at hand. In my case, someone said there was a firmware update. That is great, except, support never told me that. I think it is relevant to know in this case.
While I wish to support smaller businesses, there is not a chance in hell I would be supporting Purism. If I am ever asked about recommendations, I would say anything but Purism, including a big tech product. This is because above the purported features offered, with the other guys, you actually get a computer that ships without any issues and in case it does, the company actually honors the local regulations and does something to resolve the matter.