But who’s to say whether google or some future accessor/buyer won’t use voice recognition? (Not to mention that there are many purely logical tools/methods re-identify.)
It is arguable that this is abusive and should be illegal.
They always say that calls are recorded for “quality and training purposes” (or similar wording) and in some industries calls are recorded for legitimate purposes (e.g. where a dispute about what was said would be highly significant).
However “calls are recorded as a company asset to be flogged off when the company goes tits-up” seems somewhat dubious at least.
In a court filing Tuesday, the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA), a collective bargaining unit that represents Spirit workers, argued that Google relied on consumer protection laws to guarantee the data wouldn’t contain personally identifying information (PII). However, those laws do not cover worker confidentiality, and that allegedly leaves a huge privacy loophole in Google’s deal, especially when you consider that the tech giant is buying worker data, not consumer data.
When you buy the recordings of customer service calls, you are buying both. It is potentially a breach of privacy both of the employee and of the customer.