I intend to call mine my “phone.” And eventually I expect it to be able to come to me when called. 
1 Like
In combination with a drone or some Boston dynamic pet it would be phone on steroids. ^^
Purism/Apple
L5/iPhone
One is the company the other is the phone model. So L5 it is!
1 Like
Once again (meaning of the topic lost in iterations), this device (produced by purism) is L5. But together with pinephone which is already another device which can run generic desktop os - what device class it is? It is definitely a phone (as my old Siemens DECT phone) but it is also a portable computer (as PineBook or even my intel laptop).
1 Like
Actually right now it’s not a lot to very many people. Calls texts emails internet etc not very functional so you can call it whatever you think it might eventually be.
Thanks, that was really helpful.
1 Like
It was nonsense as is this thread. Just fun not technical. I should have been more serious. I’m sorry
Not technical does not mean not meaningful. We decide how we present the phone(s) to other people who never heard of such thing.
2 Likes
I’ll be happy when I just get my phone. You can handle the marketing. Whatever. There should be an award for the daily Alpha poster. The Passive Agressive Ego Oscar!
At the end of the day, people are just going to call it their “phone”.
1 Like
Sometimes, distinctive features of this devices are important to name, e.g., when such things happen: https://wiki.termux.com/wiki/Termux_Google_Play
I had another idea for a name (even if we already started to vote):
Libcom -> liberty computer/communicator/community what ever.
Btw I can understand the highest vote “GNU/Linux phone or GnuPhone or PocketGnu or GNU/Phonux”, but I also can install windows and play windows games on it, can’t I? Or even a very other system that doesn’t exist right now and that is not a Linux. 
@prolog: I didn’t vote for freephone, cause it sounds a bit like fairphone.
1 Like
Arguably you can do all that in a GNU/Linux operating system.
You can call or re-name the device category whatever you want. Unless the GNU/Linux development and marketing for whatever reason isn’t really focussed on a joint effort to get a simple and unified product line-up to the general public it won’t get adopted at all.
The communities and manufacturers should get together in order to unchain a real revolution for GNU/Linux based devices rather than continue to splintering the amazing operating system and devices, several stores with trazillions of odd named applications that do not appeal to Average Joe in any way
Better have collaborations emerge to get the devices up for display in (online) shops and presented by telecom and privacy oriented ISP’s. This should gain more interest and push GNU/Linux based devices on national levels. Remember, unlike the community members, to non tech-savvy people in the street Linux in general is still perceived as an obscure operating system, that is if they are familiair with Linux in the first place.
If not taking the joint effort route, like the many forks and individual communities, the GNU/Linux devices will end up being yet another obscure products used by a select targetgroup. Restraint and depending on little donations, no dedicated independent major investors, not stimulated by governments financing as being a true disrupting way to break the duopoly, no adoption by school systems, limited and splintered development resources and just a bunch of active community members to take this forward little by little.
You may be fine with that for now, but when the Librem 5 V2 and Pinephone V2 will arrive and turn out to be real competitive products there will be no substantial basis to market them.
I would hate to see Linux portable devices (I prefer Linuxphone because that’s what it is) not succeed and seeing the devices be just in limited use.
a) Not totally (you need time to make it running and sometimes there is no time to do so).
b) The important fact is, that you can install other OS then any Linux. I also wouldn’t call my desktop pc at home Linux- or Windows-pc. The only OS difference to this device is, that Linux is preinstalled by default instead of usually windows.
Much like trying to get windows running on an arm device that doesn’t have a snapdragon processor.
I think every computer sold by someone who isn’t star labs, purism, system76, penguin, or apple are marketed as “Windows PCs” because they come with windows preinstalled. Or perhaps because they have hardware supported by ready-to-go drivers written for windows, in which case you could argue that this phone/cumputer/whatever would be a linux phone/computer/whatever for the same reason.
Honestly, though, its all semantics. I call it a tomayto, you call it a tomahto.
2 Likes
And what is my pc without any system installed before I installed something? Btw Windows is just an example - can also be something else that does not exist right now. 
For me Librem 5 is just hardware - other then Androrid-phones or iPhones which includes software you cannot change (even if you install something else above Android). For me it is important to be able to change the system totally. “Gnu-Phone” or “Linuxphone” sounds like another phone which is closed to such an OS, what is definitely not. And that’s why it sounds so weird to me.
But maybe it’s just me.
What has happened? I go to winter break/hibernation and when I come back this fun and silly little thread has gotten all serious? I thought we had plenty of those already…
@Ick there are plenty of ways of looking at this classification of phone and the name for them. From the GPC functionality perspective to the OS-centric view to the FOSS principle emphasis to the evolutionary sentimentality to the futuristic bleeding edge idealism. And then there are the different needs and uses, as in what is right for the different audiences - when explaining to semi tech savvy friend (still uses a landline), to your granny (an IT specialist), for marketing to a more mundane segment etc. And are we using daily shorthand speak or do we want to use more polished brand aware language. Not to mention, thinking Venn diagrams, one can be many and all can have value =true.
So, if anyone has a preference, why not elaborate what is your viewpoint and usecase at least, before arguing much further. Mine are:
– pcphone, in daily speak, when trying to emphasize that it’s more than a phone and I’m using something that has features that others don’t
– linuxphone, in daily speak, probably with people I don’t like, when I’m expressing irritation on why someone would be using some insecure and non-private alternatives and why they would expect me to use some of their obscure favorite app (like FB or WA)
– GPC, in more formal, in depth conversation and technical situation, when I’m explaining (probably with my eyes shining) the new communication and data management paradigm that is the next evolutionary branch from common “smart” phones
– phone, daily speak, referring to the function and the physical brick when I’m cussing and searching for it while it keeps ringing
3 Likes
Didn’t mean to be arguing (I’m sorry @Ick if I came across that way), just hashing out different opinions. This thread is all in good fun.
1 Like
That’s how languages are working. I also call my current smartphone from time to time “handy” or “telephon”. I also will call my L5 “linuxphone” from time to time if I want to show that it can run any linux-system. But that does not mean, that the device category itself shouldn’t have a specific name.
I also know that on smartphone there is not so much smart. But the cool thing in this thread is, that we - the community - can discuss instead of some marketing people. We can decide ourselves, if we want to have a more marketing name or a more device orientated name. So if I think something is not so good to use, I can tell it. If most other people think that my point is not such important, then it’s fine.
I like how this thread is going on in general. Even if not all people see any sense in it.
3 Likes