Sounds like a quite strange versioning scheme to me… ![]()
According to the script it’s spidey sense told it that my Librem was a 13v3 - I confirmed that by picking the default option. When I used the script the second time it’s spidey sense told it that my Librem was a 13v2, this time I didn’t confirm that, I picked option 4 (Librem 13 v3).
I don’t know the background of that versioning decision but since the product name is used for example in udev rules it may be a good idea to be consistent with that, even if there’s no real difference.