Is this another article written by an Artificial (pseudo)Intelligence? These em-dashes look suspicious.
As far as I can see last post that wasn’t using em dashes was that one:
And that is one of the easiest ways to figure out if an article was written by that, can anyone from Purism staff elaborate? Only Development Reports aren’t using these, which makes sense as these couldn’t be made by a generic “AI”.
That question would be better placed in the respective thread (and threads of all the other Purism posts, I quess). Nothing to do with the original post privacy aspect.
I agree and would like more transparency (not just from Purism) on use of AI in creating texts, it’s to be expected of marketing nowadays, I’m afraid. But I claim that so obvious and fluffy AI texts actually turn audiences against the organization, at least in the long run, so there is risk involved using AI as a shortcut - even though sometimes it may be a necessity (like, a small company not having a team of experts on staff to do professional work).