But you also spam us with AI slop and in additional you also stopped to tell that the following lines are generated by AI. I really hate it to be honest. Not you, but the AI spam. If everyone would do it, it would become really hard to find useful information when using search functionality. Just as it became already hard to find real information on the rest of the internet.
Most people skip this spam anyway when reading posts.
I’m sorry, Ick! I deleted my post so AI answer I posted here is disappeared and it’ll doesn’t come up on your next searches! Hope this help you to have cleaner results 
You know? I’m going to delete my account here because it’s too difficult to read most of the posts! My dream was to have this forum stratified in a multi level layers: from the most technical to discorsive/easy_explained for not experts like me!
I think that this and only this is the success of proprietary tech Corporations (Microsoft, Apple, Samsung,…): make easy technology to ignorants like me!
I would have appreciated to read why Dos said AI written fakes, for example, but he didn’t it forcing me to believe in his sentence by faith 
but accepting his answer by faith is exactly the same I’m doing with AI sentences: accept it by faith! But, at least, AI sentences are easy to read and understand!
Dos: [quote] I’m afraid the best it can do is probably to break your display output if it decides to be mean to you. [/quote]
Why? No explanation! Ok I accept it by faith
Dos: [quote] As usual with LLM-generated slop, you can generally assume “no” unless proven otherwise. [/quote]
Why? No explanation! Ok I accept it by faith
I expected more help/support/cooperation from you humans but don’t so no chance to learn and so support FLOSS/Purism… 
I’m sadly sure that Linux/FLOSS world will continue to be a kind of private property accessible only to a small group of experts like you!
Bye 
First of all, I never said you are not welcome here or you should stop using AI at all or we are not willing to explain things to you. It is a huge cap between spamming AI and stop communication entirely.
But as you want answers by human, we also want to communicate with human and not with AI (otherwise we would start an AI-chat ourselves). AI can generate a wall of text within seconds while we need a lot of lifetime to write answers to AI-hallucinations. I showed you two or three times how much they can hallucinate, but I am not willing to continue this, because it often takes more than 10min to write against AI nonsense. I did it, because wanted to empower you to understand where you may can use it for your own benefit and how little you can trust it if you want serious answers. I think it is just fair if you invest your own time to form some questions yourself, so that we can speak with you in person and not with AI.
I want to write with you in person and I would rather like to reform an answer 10 times to help you understanding something than writing an answer to a copy pasted AI wall of text.
My previous post may sounds a bit harsh, but please understand … when I search for Blender related information for example, half of my search results are already AI-crap and it is growing even further. I am already wasting a lot of time finding information I need for my work, just because AI is spamming the internet with non-stop-slop. I’m not entirely against AI, but to have an useful tool we need to follow some rules that it doesn’t fuck us up at the end of the day. And currently it fucks more up than it is useful. That’s why people call it slop or why Microsoft is called Microslop. People realize that the AI spam on internet (or Windows) becomes a major issue.
I am btw also fine if you quote a single sentence or even two from AI bot and form a question about it. But please no full AI quote and please always tag it with “AI” (this is super important to not fuck up other people that have little tech knowledge). As you can see, even other people want to answer your questions.
It will be got worth.. if you can not known what was A.I. and what not. And it will come like if you do not know if some kind of existence learn from books, Internet, Friends or just cheated…
I believe that it is anyone’s right to use AI but the following opinions from me should be borne in mind:
As a general observation, if you ask AI and get an answer and then you have to post here asking whether the AI answer is correct then probably you should have just asked the original question here.
In an “uncanny valley” way, AI texts also seem like AI texts which is not natural [edit: for the lack of a better term, as in, does not feel natural in the conversation - often more prominent in longer texts].
That isn’t my personal emotional reaction to AI text but that suggestion sounds like a research project. 
Its like internet or other human content. No one can check if some information was computed by hardware or biological hardware, or just virtual. And therefore - it should just be thought as art, and be individual judged.
But like some Hack and exploit - it is not clear to see what nudge pushed someone for some art. And in complex judged systems its hard to see if this is just an advertise, caused by advertised changing or just got a result by nature, or capital interest and a pushed signal by humans which thought this would be the best solution (or just by computation and supercomputers).
Its not easy and open to exploits. This is why biology and humans use more complex Vector’s…