Switching to Arch may have been a good decision for Valve, but I don’t see any advantages for Purism. Valve needs to support the latest hardware, since it is a platform for gamers, and gamers often live on the cutting edge. Purism on the other hand is always behind the tech curve, since it takes a while for FOSS drivers to be created for the latest hardware and Coreboot to support new generations of Intel processors. Then, it takes even longer for Purism to make a custom designed laptop based on what is supported by 100% FOSS. The i7-10710U was launched in August 2019, but the Librem 14 with that processor didn’t ship until April 2021.
Arch is not a good platform for corporate customers who care about stability and long term support. Most commercial Linux software supports Debian (or Ubuntu LTS), but not Arch, and Purism is trying to reach the corporate market. For example, my job is offering independent consulting for ProcessMaker. There are no instructions for how to install ProcessMaker on Arch, but there is for Debian, and it is the same situation for almost all the commercial Linux software. Arch also isn’t a good choice for people who care about security, which is one of Purism’s chief marketing points, because it changes too often and doesn’t have enough review before new packages are introduced.
Purism is trying to reach nontechnical users as well, and frankly Arch is not a good choice for that market segment. Another issue is that Debian main offers better support for people who want to use 100% free software than Parabola. It there is a technical problem with Debian main, you have an organization of 3000 developers that wants to get that problem solved. With Parabola, you only have a handful of developers, and the wider Arch community is not particularly concerned if their system needs a bit of proprietary code to function, whereas Debian is far more concerned about excluding proprietary code from main. Also, Debian has its roots in the Free Software Foundation, and most FSF diehards are still using Debian or one of its derivatives, whereas fewer of them use Arch. Based on the number of page hits it got over the last 12 months, DistroWatch ranks PureOS as #46 and Trisquel (an Ubuntu derivative) as #83. In contrast, the two 100% free software distros based on Arch are Parabola #146 and Hyperbola #184.
If we can believe DistroWatch, there are 3.4 times more users of the Debian family than the Arch family, so there is a higher probability that a buyer of Librem products will prefer that PureOS be based on Debian rather than Arch.
Distro family |
# distros |
Hits per day |
% of total |
Debian |
126 |
26376 |
53.54% |
Arch |
23 |
7799 |
15.83% |
Red Hat |
24 |
2845 |
5.78% |
Slackware |
10 |
1071 |
2.17% |
Gentoo |
11 |
920 |
1.87% |
SUSE |
5 |
1225 |
2.49% |
Mandriva |
4 |
868 |
1.76% |
Puppy |
3 |
829 |
1.68% |
LFS |
4 |
299 |
0.61% |
CRUX |
4 |
238 |
0.48% |
OpenELEC |
2 |
165 |
0.33% |
Void |
2 |
330 |
0.67% |
Recalbox |
2 |
81 |
0.16% |
Pardus |
1 |
47 |
0.10% |
ROCK |
1 |
104 |
0.21% |
Android |
1 |
230 |
0.47% |
Independent |
29 |
3370 |
6.84% |
Non-Linux distros: |
|
|
|
BSD |
15 |
1694 |
3.44% |
Solaris |
4 |
291 |
0.59% |
ReactOS |
1 |
200 |
0.41% |
RISC OS |
1 |
58 |
0.12% |
MenuetOS |
1 |
58 |
0.12% |
Haiku |
1 |
166 |
0.34% |
Total |
276 |
49264 |
100.00% |
opensource.com’s unscientific poll finds similar results, with 2.7 times more users of the Debian family than the Arch family:
Distro |
Distro family |
Votes |
% of total |
Mint |
Debian |
1784 |
10.85% |
Debian |
Debian |
1073 |
6.53% |
Manjaro |
Arch |
1011 |
6.15% |
Ubuntu |
Debian |
2599 |
15.81% |
Antergos |
Arch |
262 |
1.59% |
openSUSE |
SUSE |
568 |
3.45% |
Solus |
Independent |
1274 |
7.75% |
Fedora |
Red Hat |
1441 |
8.76% |
elementary |
Debian |
927 |
5.64% |
Zorin |
Debian |
62 |
0.38% |
deepin |
Debian |
120 |
0.73% |
TrueOS |
BSD |
19 |
0.12% |
CentOS |
Red Hat |
288 |
1.75% |
Arch |
Arch |
1120 |
6.81% |
PCLinuxOS |
Independent |
2852 |
17.35% |
Other |
|
1041 |
6.33% |
Total |
|
16441 |
100.00% |
|
|
|
|
Total Debian |
|
6565 |
39.93% |
Total Arch |
|
2393 |
14.56% |
Total Red Hat |
|
1729 |
10.52% |
At any rate, Purism is now offering both Stable and Testing (Byzantium) versions of PureOS, so Purism has a solution for people who want a rolling release. Testing is usually only a month behind Arch in terms of the software that it offers, except when Debian is doing a freeze in preparation to launch a new Stable version once every 2 years.
Finally, think about the fact that Purism’s Matthias Klumpp has spent years developed Laniakea, so it takes much less manual labor to maintain a Debian derivative. To develop an equivalent system for Arch would take a long time, and distract Purism from the critical dev work that it is doing on the Phosh mobile environment.