Full quote (assuming @irvinewade is referring to the correct citation):
Breakdown:
- This is crap → This is worst crap = 133%
- Purism is crap → Not applicable, since Purism is never explicitly mentioned.
- The product is a scam → Its a scam = 40%
- You all go to hell → Not applicable, since hell is never explicitly mentioned.
- My phone does not charge → Not applicable, since the quote is claiming to be about a laptop with no explicit manufacturer and/or model name.
See also:
Everyone has the right to express themselves , especially those who paid 1400 USD for something that barely works. Some understanding is logical due to the FOSS nature but at least some basic functionality should work
The problem with that argument is that claims can be made by individuals without any substantiated evidence and/or verification for defamation purposes.