Bad blood in the forums

[FranklyFlawless]

Full quote (assuming @irvinewade is referring to the correct citation):

@singularity

This is worst crap and Ive had enought. Do not buy it ever.

It is so unrelaible. And it was so from day one up until now. Nothing changed. And never will. Its a scam. You guys should sell carrots on village market or clean toilets, maybe paint walls. But get tfo this high tech business you are not qualified to do.

I am cursing the day I fell for this laptop.

@irvinewade

It is, I suppose, possible to have interpreted those as five separate quotes.

Breakdown:

1. This is crap → This is worst crap = 133%
2. Purism is crap → Not applicable, since Purism is never explicitly mentioned.
3. The product is a scam → Its a scam = 40%
4. You all go to hell → Not applicable, since hell is never explicitly mentioned.
5. My phone does not charge → Not applicable, since the quote is claiming to be about a laptop with no explicit manufacturer and/or model name.

See also:

@FranklyFlawless

That citation does not exactly match up with the exaggerated claim(s).

@Xeda

1. How did we get to this point?

Selective attention.

@Xeda

2. How do we make this a healthier forum?

@FranklyFlawless

Maybe we should all volunteer for Purism and be the change we want to be.

Bad blood in the forums

Everyone has the right to express themselves , especially those who paid 1400 USD for something that barely works. Some understanding is logical due to the FOSS nature but at least some basic functionality should work

Bad blood in the forums

The problem with that argument is that claims can be made by individuals without any substantiated evidence and/or verification for defamation purposes.