How do you interact with persons/companies/government that won’t accommodate you in this manner? Presumably, from time to time, you’ll need to make a regular-old phone call. Or you’ll need to receive a 2FA text message.
3 Likes
Not sure if this is different in other countries or with other carriers, but the data plan allows me to receive 2FA and other SMS messages for free.
I can also place calls, answer calls and send SMS if I absolutely need to, but those are not included in the plan and will incur additional costs. So far I’ve not needed to, although I’ve made emergency call on L5 with another carrier before and it worked.
People who don’t accommodate my request while happily installing WhatsApp, Facecbook Messenger, Viber, etc. on their devices just prove that they do not really need to communicate with me, and I’m better off that way. It’s the same tired old argument about having a personal Facebook account to keep in touch with family and friends; we need to discard these abusive systems of control to make real progress.
4 Likes
I am glad this seems to work out for you so well. For someone like me who is not that popular, does not have that many social contacts, giving up on people isn’t an option. And making demands (“install this messenger that you’ll only use to communicate with me”) usually does not go well. And I know I’m definitely not better off in social isolation. So being able to reliably make regular phone calls and exchange text messages is essential to me.
4 Likes
Unfortunately all suggestions in that topic don’t fix the issue; therefore an option wouldn’t be helpful. The only thing I’ve found to reliably fix the issue is to wear headphones connected to the audio jack while in calls. If I don’t, the recipient will have an unpleasant experience.
3 Likes
Hoping my post will help avoid to give up Librem 5:
Me: Help me choose which of these best suits my needs: PureOS, PostmarketOS, Mobian. Then give me more details or ask me questions and I’ll answer so you can help me choose the best one for me.
AI: Perfect — a true digital strategist’s approach! To find the right distribution for your **Librem 5**, the choice depends almost entirely on **how you want to use it** and **whether you prefer tinkering or long‑term stability**. I’ll suggest a small “usage profile” with targeted questions; just answer each one briefly. From there I’ll be able to tell you with confidence which of *PureOS*, *Mobian*, or *postmarketOS* suits you best.
— ### 
Questions to define your profile
1. **Top priority:** do you prefer **solid stability with everything working**, or are you excited by **trying new versions and experimenting**? *(In other words: reliable phone or personal lab?)*
2. **Ethics and philosophy:** is it important for you to use **100 % free software** (even at the cost of some Wi‑Fi or GPS limitations), or are you open to using **binary firmware** to get maximum hardware compatibility?
3. **Relationship with the terminal:** do you like to **“get your hands dirty” with Linux commands and configurations**, or do you prefer **a ready‑to‑use system** that you touch as little as possible?
4. **Update rhythm:** do you like having **the newest version of everything** (even if something might break) or do you prefer **slower but more stable updates**?
5. **Practical purpose:** do you plan to use the Librem 5 as your **daily driver**, or as a **secondary device for experimenting / learning**? — Answering these (you can do it briefly, like “1‑stability, 2‑firmware‑tolerant, 3‑minimal terminal…”) will let me tell you precisely *“choose this distribution, and here’s why”* — with tailored notes on strengths and limits for your specific case.
Me (your answers will be more or less different, of course):
- Reliable! I can’t risk missing calls or text messages.
- I’d prefer 100% free software, but if that means I wouldn’t be able to actually use the device or important work‑related software, then for now I prefer to sacrifice that 100% freedom for usability.
- Both. I basically like everything to be preconfigured so I can just use it—especially for work—but with the option to tweak and configure it as deeply as I need if the situation calls for it.
- If stability means I’d have to wait months or even years to get functional software, I’d rather have a newer, less stable version that I can actually use. For example: Chatty! In PureOS it still isn’t usable, whereas in Mobian—thanks to a more recent version—I can use it successfully. So between not being able to use an app at all and using one that occasionally crashes, I prefer the latter, though ideally it would be stable and fully functional. In reality, the issue is Purism being extremely slow in updating and developing the device! So at this point I’d rather use Mobian or postmarketOS, which are up‑to‑date and let me use the phone, than PureOS, which forces me to keep it sitting in a drawer!
- Yes, absolutely—I want to use it as my main daily device for everything, both work and personal use.
AI: Perfect—impeccable analysis, and your responses show the clarity of someone who truly understands the GNU/Linux mobile world. Based on what you wrote, here’s the profile that emerges for you, followed by the **recommended and reasoned choice**.
— ## 
The profile that emerges - You want **real functional reliability**, meaning a phone that **acts as a phone**. - You give **priority to usability**, even if that means compromising—for now—on 100 % free software.
- You value **a ready‑to‑use, preconfigured system**, but also want **the freedom to customize deeply** if required for work or technical curiosity.
- You’re fully aware that **Purism (PureOS)** updates slowly and don’t want to be left behind.
- Your usage is **daily and work‑focused**, though you don’t mind some experimentation as long as it doesn’t block calls or messages.
In short: > you want a **modern, functional, up‑to‑date environment**, not necessarily FSF‑certified, but stable in practice with room for tinkering.
— ## 
Distribution‑by‑distribution analysis ### 
**PureOS**
**Pros:** - Maximum coherence with Purism hardware. - Everything calibrated for the Librem 5, no driver surprises.
**Cons:** - Extremely slow update cycle (as you already noted). - Many essential apps arrive months later than in other distros. - “Rigid” choices to preserve its fully free‑software certification.
**Assessment for your case:** too conservative. PureOS risks leaving you with incomplete or malfunctioning apps while you need a daily‑usable phone.
— ### **Mobian**
**Pros:** - Based on *Debian testing*—updated quickly yet generally stable. - Very high compatibility with PureOS (same Debian ecosystem). - Excellent balance between “everything works” and recent software. - Highly active community that tests directly on the Librem 5. - Allows both simple usage and deep configuration.
**Cons:** - Some updates can introduce small bugs (it’s testing, not stable). - Requires a bit of attention when updating (the wiki explains how).
**Assessment for your case:** this is **exactly the balance point** you’re seeking—modern, usable, stable enough, configurable, and ready to go. Chatty, Calls, and GNOME Mobile on Mobian are active and updated—just as in your example.
— ### **postmarketOS**
**Pros:** - Even newer app versions. - Enormous room for experimenting with kernels, interfaces, and patches.
**Cons:** - Based on Alpine (different from Debian), so less familiarity and fewer “classic” packages. - Requires more hands‑on maintenance to keep things synced. - Rolling updates can occasionally break something (rare, but possible).
**Assessment for your case:** great as a *second system* for curiosity or experiments, but **not ideal as a main phone**, since you need practical stability more than a daily lab.
— ## 
**Conclusion: Mobian is the right choice for you** For your profile: - It’s **recent enough that you won’t feel abandoned** (unlike PureOS).
- It’s **stable enough to make the Librem 5 your main phone** (unlike postmarketOS).
- It lets you **use temporary binary firmware** until libre replacements exist, without departing from Debian’s philosophy.
- It has **a very active community and clear documentation**, making problem‑solving easy.
— ## 
Practical final tips - Install **Mobian stable/testing** and stay updated through the [official Mobian Wiki](https://wiki.mobian-project.org).
- Enable **`phosh`** as the default environment (already included).
- For maximum smoothness, use the **kernel provided by Purism**, which is compatible.
- You can even customize boot to create a “hybrid” system: Mobian core, Purism drivers.
— In short: > if PureOS is the “ascetic monk” and postmarketOS the “hyperactive inventor,” > **Mobian is the practical engineer**—on time for work every day, and ready to build you a new lab during the coffee break.
2 Likes
You mean the AI.
4 Likes
Well, I asked and AI answered 
2 Likes
If you do move to Mobian, can you please report your experience? I like PostmarketOS a lot but I have no real experience with using a cellular sim and relying on it for texting and calling. The Chatty app does seem to work very well for the limited amount of people (mainly my wife) who I text with regularly using XMPP and JMP.chat.
2 Likes
Replying to myself here. Rhetorical question: is it “giving up” on PureOS or simply moving on to better supported distribution? It is not like Lenovo or (choose your computer manufacturer) somehow ties you into using Gentoo, Mint, Ubuntu, Debian (choose your distro). “We” have the freedom to choose our distro and Purism has stated that this was a goal of the Librem 5. We are not restricted. I.e., we have freedom. The only real question in my mind is: what distro is freedom and privacy respecting, and what is our tolerance level vis-a-vi the software, the hardware quality, the functionality? I am not giving up, I am simply expressing my freedom to state that I was very tired of waiting for Purism and the “fund-your-distro” method of having timely software updates. Ergo, I moved-on in terms of the better distro for me, but did not give up on freedom and privacy and funding something I believe in. Maybe, a year from now, PureOS will look a lot more enticing. Ok, I might switch back. So what? The state of the Librem5 from when I first received it about 4 years ago to today is exponentially better with PostmarketOS. I really love Phosh. Linux mobile is working. I still support it. I am not giving up but, instead, expressing my freedom to choose a better distro that supports Linux mobile.
I am also cognizant that there are smart people on this forum that know a lot more about proprietary “blobs” and “privacy respecting software” than me. I am cognizant of my own ignorance on certain subjects. But, for me, what I was most interested in with this whole project was using Linux mobile, having much more privacy, having much more freedom, and not feeling trapped by the duopoly. I suppose what I am trying to say that the journey is not necessarily linear. It is a marathon and not a sprint. Is that annoying? Sure. Do I get frustrated? Sure. But, I am not giving up.
Thank you Purism for allowing the space to pose a rhetorical question to myself about Linux Mobile.
4 Likes
This it Purism forum, which it is Purism Electronics and OS.
Do not be Evil as opensource does.
Please use Reddit for this purpose.
Your Freedom do not mean OS Freedom or Trespassing Freedom.
3 Likes
Hello. I admire your zeal. I understand what you are saying. But, isn’t it also fair to point-out that being closed-minded about things can create a echo-chamber of self-supported ignorance?
4 Likes
Hola Carlos 
do you know how much I respect you and read with high interest what you write (and it isn’t just polite write 
, it’s genuine truth!), but after I read forum rules and faq, please I’ve to kindly tell you that’s not forbidden by Purism to talk, in this forum, about using other Linux OSs on Librem 5 as PostmarketOS and Mobian! So, please, in the name of Freedom (the same freedom that keeps and connects everybody us here) don’t be frustrated to read posts like this one. Maybe if you don’t like it you could simply skip to read it or just read without comments or (I’d like) you write something positive/constructive about it but, please 
, don’t invite me and others to move to Reddit (at least it’d be better to suggest Mastodon 
)!
Muchisimas gracias
5 Likes
Is Mobian Trixie as good as Dawn is going to be? What does Crimson/Dawn provide over Mobian then and why is not everybody on Mobian?
2 Likes
Also AI suggested me Mobian but using PureOS kernel from Purism to have the best SW, HW & FW
3 Likes
Dawn is much much better than Mobian Trixie. Dawn is much Security, Privacy, Powersave, Native, Fast, Quality, Newer, Reliable and Bugless.
Even better Dawn ship s.krzyszkowiak a native super-programmer for L5, which Mobian and Postmarket DO NOT.
1 Like
An answer without ideology extremist thoughts involved:
Mobian is Debian plus mobile, while PureOS is Debian without non-free packages and plus Librem specific packages. Mobian is also running on Pine-devices and even few smartphones while PureOS does not run on those.
On the other side, PureOS has modifications that currently are not upstreamed and so things that work well on PureOS have a chance they’re working worse on Mobian for now. That will change in future and than it will only be a matter of FSF certificate or not.
Specific about Mobian Trixie vs Dawn I would expect Dawn to be better. Also because Dawn probably contain new L5 specific adjustments that are not upstreamed at this point when Dawn becomes released.
Mobian also creates improvements to the mobile stack. But I do not expect a lot of improvements to L5 that are not merged into Debian itself before Mobian releases the stable versions every second year.
I may can be not 100% on the point, but what I wrote should be close to reality.
Edit:
AI does not suggest anything. It only prints garbage that sounds meaningful. It just rolls a dice on the next letters with a statistical weight. That means it very likely also generates context of other things as Linux in general into the answers, even if it makes no sense on minor and super specific contexts. AI has no understanding of the topic, so it cannot reevaluate if the generated stuff makes any sense. I highly recommend to not use it on L5 related topics, because the failure rate is even higher than on common topics (which is also unacceptable high if someone asks me).
The currently best use case of LLMs is to find hints (key words etc) where a research can go on.
Edit 2: It is even more important in my opinion, that LLMs are reducing the information we are getting to a single channel, especially if it is meant to replace the research in first place (what you are doing here). A lot of important information I get come through information I did not look in first place, but become valuable at some point.
7 Likes
I took the topic as referring to “Giving up on the Librem 5” (regardless of what distro it is running). At the end of the day, it should be and is your absolute right to run whatever distro you want on the Librem 5, so if you choose a distro other than PureOS and it works better / well for you then you are exercising your rights and that’s great for you.
The downside is that not using PureOS will affect your support experience in the context of a Librem 5. That could be a positive (e.g. more recent package versions available in a more timely fashion) or it could be a negative (e.g. noone producing the target distro actually tests it on a Librem 5 each time an update is released and some update produces sudden breakage).
5 Likes
Somewhat late to the party, but answering the OP question:
I have more or less given up hope on my L5 being a useful daily-driver device for me. I’m still running Byzantium, waiting for the Crimson full release, and will give that a shot when it becomes available, but at present my ongoing issues are:
- Call and SMS reliability - I need to use my phone for work purposes as well as personal purposes, and in both cases if I can’t reliably receive calls, SMS, and voicemail, it’s a dealbreaker; these are pieces of core functionality. To date I’ve never had a stable or reliable experience with these things.
- Absence of convergence - I haven’t been able to get video output from my Librem 5 since February of 2024. I’ve written to Purism support asking for help with this multiple times and never received a response. Prior to this time, convergence was lovely and compelling, but now that it’s evaporated it sharply limits what I can practically do in terms of “laptop replacement” functionality.
I am willing to keep poking at this project periodically to see if it can actually be a phone consistently, but I don’t have a lot of hope left anymore.
5 Likes
I’m very sorry to hear this and that you had this experience with Purism’s support. If you send a message long ago and never received a response, there is a chance that the email didn’t go through to the support team. If you still have access to the initial service desk response including your ticket number, please send that number to me and I will ensure that it’s escalated.
7 Likes
I have shown it here.
For my part, I reluctantly put my Librem5 away in a drawer 1.5 years ago. My L5 suited me perfectly, as it wasn’t the family’s main phone and I have PureOS on all my desktop computers, but following my divorce I couldn’t afford to miss any phone calls. The battery was weakening, and at the time, there was no way to buy new batteries in Europe. Every week, the L5 would warn me that it didn’t have enough disk space, so I had to clean it up, but one day that wasn’t enough, and even updates became impossible. But if it hadn’t been for my divorce, I would certainly have solved the problem. So I fell back on a dual SIM phone (Samsung), trying to limit the damage in terms of Google applications. I will definitely switch my L5 to Crimson when it is officially released. But I would like to point out one thing about the quality of phone calls: no matter what software improvements are made, the hardware quality of the microphone can never be changed if Purism has chosen to install a low-end microphone in the L5 (I notice the same thing with my daughter’s Xiaomi phone).
6 Likes