Install From sotware.pureos.net - NOT!

A core aspect of open source is that if someone claims that “it’s not hard to fix” then the response can be … “patches welcome”.

However if it were me trying to submit a patch to Purism, I would make sure that I am running current software first. I don’t want to waste my time fixing a problem upstream from byzantium if the problem has already been fixed upstream from crimson.

At the same time, there is no way that I would be asking you to reflash to crimson. For example, there “may” be functionality that works in byzantium but is not yet working in crimson - so this might not be a great option for you right now anyway.

The best customers to be submitting patches to Purism would be customers who have two phones - one for daily driving with stable software (byzantium) and one for “crash and burn” with bleeding edge software (crimson).

2 Likes

Oooooh Nope. I wouldn’t go so far as to provide the patch, a coded bleh! Through a variety of trial and error, I found the probable causes. The PureOS Store was tweaked and missed the target.

I can’t fix it because I do not have the Admin access, don’t want it either, and I’ve already posted what the problem is and that it can be fixed (IMO). The link on the Dtop needs to be redirect to the same landing page as softare.pureos.net.
image

I think people that read this take in to account my obvious lack of Linus skills and the complexity of my presentation and put no faith in it.

Crimson will be a long time coming before it’s ready for beta testing (AKA release). And a longer time And as such, for some older people, myself too, I’d like to see something working without wondering what/who will outlast the other. The person responsible for coding the links should take a look. Let’s get Byzantium working before fixing it with Crimson.
~s~

~s

1 Like

I know why it “malfunctions”.

1 Like

I know why it malfunctions.

On another note:
FYI: I don’t never depend on the number of clicks that the links shows beside it such as to weigh… >

image

because it doesn’t always take in to account anyone that uses right-click > go to link. That said, I did visit it, read it and

1 Like

I’d like to finish that sentence —
it’s just that… one system works, and the other does not and it doesn’t need a patch, it needs someone with LAMP access to edit a couple of files.
I am speaking from my bailiwick now.
OK, all looks good now. I have installed a couple of programs already, and used a web browser to get and do.

~S

1 Like

Can you tell us why?

1 Like

Again? I explain it my OP (#1) above again in post #21 above, And lots of times in discussion in Topic Old Links to Store Still Fail around post #20 -

Hope that helps,
~s

1 Like